Optimal disc tension infiltrometer estimation techniques for hydraulic properties of soil under different land uses

Zhou Beibei, Wang Quanjiu, Wu Xiangbo

Abstract


Different land use, and associated variations in agricultural or silvicultural practices, can cause substantial variations in soils’ hydraulic properties. Thus, the optimal method for measuring these properties may vary, even among neighboring sites. In this study these variations were examined by comparing measurements of hydraulic properties of soil in fields used for poplar, alfalfa and wheat cultivation obtained with two steady flow methods (the White and Sully, and single disc with multiple tension methods) and two transient flow methods (the single disc with single tension, and multiple tensions with multiple disc radius methods). The fields were all located in Changwu municipality, a major grain-producing area in Shaanxi Province, China. Disc tension infiltrometers were used to measure unconfined, unsaturated infiltration over a range of supply pressure heads (h = −9 cm, −6 cm, −3 cm and 0) at the soil surface. Intact soil cores were sampled near the surface to determine bulk density and soil water retention curves at potentials ranging from −0.15 kPa to −100 kPa. Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity values over the range of supply pressure heads were estimated using Wooding’s equation for steady-state flow from a disc source. The van Genuchten water retention model was fitted to experimental data to estimate the parameter values. The results indicated that land use affects soils’ saturated and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity. Further, steady state flow methods are most appropriate for measuring hydraulic properties of soils under poplar and wheat, due to their high organic contents and saturated hydraulic conductivity. However, for soils supporting alfalfa (which are more homogeneous), instant methods provide better results, in addition to substantial time and labor savings.
Keywords: soil property, hydraulic conductivity, land uses, disc tension infiltrometer
DOI: 10.3965/j.ijabe.20160904.2161

Citation: Zhou B B, Wang Q J, Wu X B. Optimal disc tension infiltrometer estimation techniques for hydraulic properties of soil under different land uses. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2016; 9(4): 92－98.

Keywords


soil property, hydraulic conductivity, land uses, disc tension infiltrometer

Full Text:

PDF

References


Wu X B, Wang Q J. Comparative study on measuring soil water conductivity in different land use types by using disc infiltrometer. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2012; 30(1): 94–98.

Hu W, Shao M A. Temporal changes of soil hydraulic under different land uses. Geoderma, 2009; 149: 355–366.

Hu W, Shao M A, Si B C. Seasonal changes in surface bulk density and saturated hydraulic conductivity of natural landscapes. European Journal Soil Science, 2012; 475: 229–241.

Radka K, Veronika J. Soil structure and soil hydraulic properties of Haplic Luvisol used as arable land and grassland. Soil Tillage Research, 2011; 111(2): 154–161.

Bhuyan M H M, Ferdousi M R, Iqbal M T. Increasing yield and agronomic efficiency of boro rice (Oryza sativa) by fertigation with bed planting compared with conventional planting. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2014; 7(5): 34–47.

Vos E C, Kooistram M J. The effect of soil-structure differences in silt loam soil under various farm-management systems on soil physical-properties and simulated land qualities. Agriculture Ecosystem Environment, 1994; 51(1-2): 227–238.

Noellemeyer E, Frank F. Carbon content and aggregation related to soil physical and biological properties under a land-use sequence in the semiarid region of central Argentina. Soil Tillage Research, 2008; 99(2): 179–190.

Schwartz R C, Evett S R, Unger P W. Soil hydraulic properties of cropland compared with reestablished and native grassland. Geoderma, 2003; 116(9): 47–60.

White I, Sully M J. Macroscopic and microscopic capillary length and time scales from field infiltration. Water Resource Research, 2003; 23: 1514–1522.

Ankeny M D, Kaspar T C, Horton R. Simple field method for determining unsatu-rated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1991; 52: 467–470.

Smettem K R J, Clothier B E. Measuring unsaturated sorptivity and hydraulic conductivity using multiple disk permeameters. Journal of Soil Science, 1989; 40: 563–568.

Hussen A A, Warrick A W. Alternative analyses of hydraulic data from disc tension infiltrometers. Water Resource Research, 1993; 29: 4103–4108.

Angulo-Jaramillo R, Vandervaere J P, Roulier S, Thony J L, Gaudet J P, Vauclin M. Field measurement of soil hydraulic properties by disc and ring infiltrometers, A review and recent developments. Soil and Tillage Research, 2000; 55(5): 1–29.

Wooding R. Steady infiltration from a shallow circular pond. Water Resource Research, 1968; 4: 1259–1273.

Gardner W. Some steady state solutions to the unsaturated flow equation with application to evaporation from water table. Soil Science, 1958; 85: 228–232

Philip J P. Numerical solution of equations of the diffusion type with diffusivity concentration-depentdent. Soil Science Society of America Proceeding, 1995; 51(7): 885–892.

Philip J R. Theory of infiltration. Advance in Hydroscience, 1969; 9: 215–296.

Smettem K R, Parlange J Y. Three dimensional analysis of infiltration from the disc infiltrometer. 1 A capacity-based theory. Water Resource Research, 1994; 30: 2925–2929.

Haverkamp R, Roes P J, Smettem K R J. Three-dimensional analysis of infiltration from the disc infiltration. II. Physically-based infiltration equation. Water Resource Research, 2003; 30: 2931–2935.

Vandervaere J P, Vauclin M, Elrick D E. Transient flow from tension infiltrometers.Ⅰ. The two-parameter equation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2000; 64: 1263–1272.

Jarvis N J, Messing I. Near saturated hydraulic conductivity in soil of contrasting texture measured by tension infiltrometer. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1995; 59: 27–34.




Copyright (c)



2023-2026 Copyright IJABE Editing and Publishing Office